“This is part of a wider internal review being undertaken by Gulf investors across multiple jurisdictions. It is not specific to Pakistan, nor is it indicative of any immediate divestment decision,” a source stated regarding Etisalat’s potential exit from PTCL on April 30, 2026.
Etisalat is reviewing its exposure to Pakistan’s telecom sector as part of a broader portfolio optimisation strategy. The review comes at a time when PTCL has posted its first net profit in over four years after acquiring Telenor Pakistan. This recent success raises questions about the motivations behind the review.
PTCL holds strategic importance for Pakistan, with the government owning around 62% of the company. Etisalat controls 26%, while private investors hold the remaining 12%. The UAE-based telecom giant acquired PTCL in 2005 for $2.6 billion but has withheld $800 million due to unresolved property transfer issues.
The review of Etisalat’s investment is influenced by global economic uncertainty and regional geopolitical tensions. Pakistan recently repaid approximately $3.5 billion to the UAE to support its foreign exchange reserves. Additionally, Saudi Arabia increased its safe deposits in Pakistan from $3 billion to $8 billion to help bridge financing gaps.
Key facts:
- Pakistan government holds 62% stake in PTCL.
- Etisalat owns 26% of PTCL shares.
- Private investors control 12% of PTCL.
- Etisalat paid $2.6 billion for PTCL acquisition in 2005.
- PTCL recently achieved a net profit after four years.
Diplomatic sources indicate that economic ties between Pakistan and the UAE remain stable despite the ongoing review. Yet, no final decision has been made regarding Etisalat’s potential exit from PTCL. The IMF’s executive board is set to meet on May 8 to consider releasing a $1.21 billion tranche for Pakistan, adding another layer of complexity to the situation.
PTCL stated it is not aware of any shareholders’ plans for changes at this stage. The evolving capital allocation strategies among sovereign-linked investors reflect shifting priorities in light of global market conditions and regional dynamics.