India’s controversial plan to use crocodiles and snakes as a deterrent along the Bangladesh border has sparked widespread criticism from human rights activists and environmentalists. The proposal aims to curb undocumented migration and smuggling across the 4,096 km long border. Nearly 3,000 km of this border has already been fenced by India.
The Border Security Force (BSF) issued a directive on March 26 to explore the feasibility of deploying reptiles in vulnerable riverine gaps. However, crocodiles are not native to these riverine stretches. Activists have expressed alarm at the prospect of using dangerous animals to deter migrants.
Key criticisms include:
- The proposal is viewed as inhumane and poses risks to local communities.
- No country has previously used wild predators as a method of border surveillance.
- Flooding in riverine regions could carry venomous snakes into nearby areas, endangering local residents.
- The introduction of crocodiles and snakes may disrupt local ecosystems.
Harsh Mander, a human rights activist, stated, “There’s no reason to expose an undocumented immigrant in a river to crocodiles and snakes, or the threat of gunpoint.” Angshuman Choudhury criticized the plan as “peak cruelty against and dehumanisation of undocumented immigrants.” He added that these forced expulsions are new border control mechanisms that are very sinister.
The border was sealed for three days starting April 26 for security during elections in West Bengal. Special permissions are granted for emergency medical cases, voters, and vehicles carrying perishable goods during this period. Polling concluded on April 29 at 5:30 PM.
Observers expect ongoing debate about the ethical implications of this plan. The situation continues to evolve as officials consider public safety alongside wildlife conservation efforts.