Tulsi Gabbard Addresses Global Threats in Senate Testimony

tulsi gabbard — PK news

Tulsi Gabbard, the Director of National Intelligence, testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee on March 19, 2026, addressing significant global threats to the United States. During her testimony, Gabbard identified Pakistan as a state posing a considerable threat, particularly due to its missile capabilities, which she warned could potentially reach the American homeland.

Gabbard highlighted that Pakistan’s long-range ballistic missile development might include intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) capable of striking the U.S. homeland. She stated, “Pakistan’s long-range ballistic missile development potentially could include ICBMs with the range capable of striking the Homeland.” Currently, the assessed figure of missiles threatening the U.S. homeland stands at approximately 3,000, with projections indicating this number could expand to over 16,000 by 2035.

In her remarks, Gabbard also discussed Iran, noting that while the regime remains intact, it has been largely degraded by military operations. She stated, “The regime in Iran appears to be intact but largely degraded by Operation Epic Fury,” and emphasized that Iran’s nuclear enrichment program had been significantly impacted, saying, “Iran’s nuclear enrichment program was obliterated.” Gabbard’s testimony indicated that Iran is not currently rebuilding its nuclear capabilities following U.S. strikes.

Furthermore, Gabbard pointed out that South Asian militant groups continue to pose a persistent danger to U.S. interests. She warned that threats to the U.S. homeland will expand significantly, with an expected increase in missile threats. The range of Pakistan’s Shaheen-III missile is approximately 2,800 kilometers, underscoring the potential risks.

Gabbard’s aide, Joseph Kent, recently resigned in opposition to President Donald Trump’s military actions against Iran, reflecting the internal tensions regarding U.S. foreign policy. Despite this, Gabbard defended Trump’s decision to engage militarily, asserting, “As our Commander in Chief, he is responsible for determining what is and is not an imminent threat.”

Details remain unconfirmed regarding the exact implications of Gabbard’s assessment on U.S.-Pakistan relations and the future of Iran’s military capabilities post-war. Gabbard’s testimony underscores the ongoing complexities of U.S. national security in a rapidly evolving global landscape.

Back To Top