During the match, Usman Tariq openly criticized Daryl Mitchell for employing a tactic suggested by Ravichandran Ashwin. The tactic involved Mitchell moving away from his crease multiple times during Tariq’s over, signaling to the umpire that he was unprepared to face the ball. This maneuver was the first of its kind used against Tariq, who is known for his unique bowling action that includes a hypermobile elbow and a pause before delivery.

Ravichandran Ashwin had previously indicated that batters could legally move away if Tariq pauses mid-delivery, a statement that has now come under scrutiny. The rules of cricket stipulate that continuous deliberate distraction by the batter may lead to a warning and a five-run penalty for the fielding side. This aspect of the game has sparked a debate on the ethics of using such tactics, especially in high-stakes matches.

In the match, Usman Tariq managed to secure two wickets from four overs, contributing significantly to Quetta Gladiators’ victory over Rawalpindi Pindiz, who were bowled out for 121 runs, losing by 61 runs. Tariq’s performance was notable, especially considering that his bowling action has been reported for a suspect action twice before but has been cleared on both occasions.

Daryl Mitchell’s performance in the match included scoring 30 runs off 32 balls, but his efforts were overshadowed by the controversy surrounding his tactics. The Quetta Gladiators finished the match with a score of 182 runs, showcasing a dominant performance that put Rawalpindi Pindiz on the back foot.

The incident has drawn varied reactions from the cricketing community. Usman Tariq expressed his thoughts on the matter, stating, “Happy to hear 5 penalty runs keep it up,” indicating his awareness of the potential consequences of Mitchell’s actions. Meanwhile, cricket analyst Ramiz Raja questioned the legitimacy of Mitchell’s tactic, asking, “Can he withdraw from the action?”

As discussions continue, the implications of this tactic on future matches remain uncertain. The cricketing world is watching closely, especially with the T20 World Cup 2026 approaching, where such strategies could play a critical role in the outcomes of games. The scrutiny surrounding Tariq’s bowling action and the tactics employed against him may lead to further developments in the rules and conduct expected from players.

Details remain unconfirmed regarding any official responses or changes to regulations that may arise from this incident. The ongoing debate highlights the complexities of sportsmanship and strategy in cricket, making it a focal point for players and fans alike.

The post Daryl mitchell usman tariq psl: Daryl Mitchell’s Tactic Against Usman Tariq in PSL appeared first on 1News.

Ahmed Shehzad is currently facing serious legal scrutiny following allegations he made against fellow cricketer Misbah-ul-Haq. The situation escalated when Misbah sent a defamation notice to Shehzad, rejecting the claims as false and damaging to his reputation. This controversy has significant implications for both parties involved.

The allegations made by Shehzad include claims regarding Haseebullah Khan’s unpaid salary, which Misbah has vehemently denied. The investigation is being conducted under Pakistan’s cybercrime laws, highlighting the seriousness of the accusations. If Shehzad’s responses to the questioning are deemed unsatisfactory, a formal First Information Report (FIR) could be registered against him.

Shehzad’s legal team is currently reviewing the defamation notice and is expected to respond soon. The matter is under legal review, with ongoing consultations between the legal representatives of both parties. This is not the first time Shehzad has made controversial claims against Misbah, indicating a pattern that could influence public perception.

Shehzad has made multiple media appearances justifying his claims, emphasizing the importance of his allegations. However, Misbah has firmly rejected these claims, asserting that they are unfounded. The situation remains fluid, with potential legal battles looming on the horizon.

As the investigation unfolds, the public is left to ponder the implications of these allegations on the reputations of both cricketers. The controversy not only affects their personal lives but also raises questions about accountability and transparency within the sport.

Details remain unconfirmed regarding the next steps in this legal matter, but the stakes are high for both Shehzad and Misbah. The outcome of this investigation could set a precedent for how similar allegations are handled in the future.

The post Ahmed Shehzad Faces Legal Scrutiny Over Misbah-ul-Haq Allegations appeared first on 1News.

The annual cricket match between Richmond College and Mahinda College, a fixture since 1905, took place on March 21, 2026, in Galle, Sri Lanka. This event has long been a highlight in the school cricket calendar, attracting attention from fans and alumni alike. However, this year’s match was marked by a controversial incident involving Usman Tariq, a player whose unique bowling style has garnered both admiration and scrutiny.

During the match, Nethuja Bashitha attempted to imitate Usman Tariq’s distinctive bowling action, which is characterized by a noticeable pause before delivering the ball. This imitation did not go unnoticed, as the umpire declared the ball a dead ball, citing that Bashitha’s pause was not part of his normal bowling action. This decision sparked discussions among players and spectators about the legality and ethics of imitating another player’s style.

Usman Tariq’s bowling action has been a topic of debate, particularly following the ICC’s declaration of its legality during the T20 World Cup 2026. Tariq has made a significant impact in the tournament, taking 11 wickets in four T20 internationals at an impressive average of 7.90. His performance has not only made him a key player for his team but has also influenced younger players who aspire to emulate his technique.

Despite the controversy, the incident has highlighted the growing trend of players adopting Usman Tariq’s bowling style. Observers note that his approach has become increasingly popular among aspiring cricketers, raising questions about originality and the boundaries of imitation in sports. Harbhajan Singh, a former Indian cricketer, advised his team to play cautiously against Tariq, acknowledging the spinner’s skill and potential impact on the game.

In response to the incident, cricket officials reiterated the importance of maintaining the integrity of the game. The umpire’s decision to call the ball dead was in accordance with the rules, which allow for five penalty runs to be awarded to the batting team for deliberate distractions. This rule aims to preserve fair play and ensure that players adhere to the established norms of the sport.

As the match progressed, reactions from players and commentators reflected a mix of amusement and concern regarding the incident. Nayan Mongia, a former Indian wicketkeeper, expressed his hope for a good match, stating, “It will be fun. We hope it will be a good match and India wins.” His comments underscore the competitive spirit that defines such fixtures, even amidst controversies.

Looking ahead, observers anticipate that discussions surrounding Usman Tariq’s bowling style will continue, as both players and officials navigate the complexities of imitation in cricket. The incident serves as a reminder of the evolving nature of the sport, where new techniques and styles can provoke debate and inspire future generations of cricketers.

Details remain unconfirmed regarding any further implications of this incident on the players involved or the broader cricket community. However, it is clear that Usman Tariq’s influence on the game is significant, and his unique approach to bowling will likely remain a topic of conversation in the cricketing world.

The post Usman Tariq’s Bowling Style Sparks Controversy in Galle appeared first on 1News.

The signing of Abrar Ahmed by Sunrisers Leeds during The Hundred auction has raised a central question: How will this decision impact the relationship between Indian and Pakistani cricket fans? The answer is complex, as it intertwines sports with deep-seated political tensions. The signing, which cost the franchise £190,000, marks a historic moment as it is the first instance of an Indian-owned team signing a Pakistani player in The Hundred.

Sunrisers Leeds is owned by the Sun Group, which also has ownership of Sunrisers Hyderabad in the Indian Premier League (IPL). This connection adds another layer of scrutiny to the signing, as Indian franchises have not signed Pakistani players since 2009, following the political fallout from the 2008 Mumbai attacks. The historical context makes this signing particularly controversial.

Sunil Gavaskar, a prominent figure in Indian cricket, has been vocal about his disapproval of the signing. He criticized the move, stating that payments made to Pakistani players indirectly support their government, which he claims contributes to the deaths of Indian soldiers and civilians. Gavaskar’s comments reflect a broader sentiment among many Indian fans who view the signing as a betrayal, given the longstanding political tensions between the two nations.

The backlash has been immediate and intense, with strong criticism surfacing on social media platforms. In response to the uproar, Sunrisers Leeds temporarily suspended their X account, indicating the level of discontent among fans. Gavaskar warned that this signing could lead to boycotts of matches, suggesting that the ramifications of this decision could extend beyond just the team and the player.

Rajeev Shukla, vice-president of the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), stated that the board cannot intervene in the signing as it involves a foreign league. This highlights the complexities of international cricket governance and the challenges faced by Indian franchises operating in a global context. The BCCI’s position underscores the autonomy of franchises in leagues like The Hundred, even when political sensitivities are at play.

Despite the criticism, Daniel Vettori, head coach of Sunrisers Leeds, defended the signing as a cricketing decision, emphasizing the player’s talent and potential contributions to the team. This perspective suggests that, while political implications are significant, the decision was also made with sporting considerations in mind.

As the situation unfolds, it remains to be seen how fans will react in the long term and whether the backlash will affect attendance and viewership for Sunrisers Leeds. The intersection of sports and politics continues to be a contentious issue, and this signing has brought those tensions to the forefront once again. Details remain unconfirmed regarding the potential impact on future signings and the overall strategy of Indian franchises in foreign leagues.

The post Abrar ahmed sunrisers leeds: Abrar Ahmed Signed by Sunrisers Leeds: A Controversial Move appeared first on 1News.

What does Sunil Gavaskar’s recent criticism of Sunrisers Leeds reveal about the ongoing tensions between India and Pakistan in cricket? Gavaskar has condemned the franchise’s decision to sign Pakistani spinner Abrar Ahmed, arguing that such actions indirectly contribute to the loss of Indian lives.

Gavaskar’s remarks were published in his column for the Indian newspaper Mid-Day, where he stated, “Is winning a tournament in a format that no other country plays in much more important than Indian lives?” This statement underscores the emotional and political weight that the signing carries for many Indian fans.

Sunrisers Leeds, owned by the Sun Group, which also manages Sunrisers Hyderabad in the Indian Premier League (IPL), secured Ahmed for GBP 190,000 (approximately Rs 2.34 crore) during The Hundred auction. This marks a significant moment, as it is the first instance of an Indian business group signing a Pakistani cricketer since the Mumbai attacks in November 2008.

The backlash against the signing has been swift, with many Indian fans calling for a boycott of Sunrisers Leeds. Gavaskar’s comments reflect a broader sentiment among supporters who feel that engaging with Pakistani players is unacceptable given the ongoing political tensions.

Rajeev Shukla, vice-president of the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), noted that the board cannot intervene in overseas leagues, yet the controversy continues to stir strong emotions. Gavaskar emphasized that “no Indian owner should be contributing to the casualties at home,” highlighting the perceived moral implications of the signing.

In response to the backlash, the England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) has reminded franchises about their fair selection and anti-discrimination policies, indicating that they are aware of the sensitivities involved.

Gavaskar’s comments also included a plea for reconsideration, stating, “There is time left to correct the mistake, and I hope better sense prevails.” This statement suggests that the situation remains fluid, and the potential for further developments exists.

As the cricket community watches closely, the implications of this signing may extend beyond the field, influencing fan sentiments and the dynamics of international cricket relations.

The post Sunil Gavaskar Criticizes Sunrisers Leeds for Signing Abrar Ahmed appeared first on 1News.

On March 12, 2026, the cricketing world witnessed a significant development when Kavya Maran, co-owner of SunRisers Leeds and SunRisers Hyderabad, made headlines by acquiring Pakistani cricketer Abrar Ahmed for £190,000 (approximately INR 2.34 crore) during The Hundred auction. This transaction marked a historic moment as it was the first time a franchise with Indian Premier League (IPL) links had signed a player from Pakistan.

Background of the Controversy

The signing of Abrar Ahmed has sparked a geopolitical controversy in India due to his past social media posts, which have been deemed anti-India. As the third-ranked T20I bowler in the world, Ahmed’s acquisition was expected to bolster the SunRisers Leeds team. However, the backlash against Maran has been swift and severe, with many fans expressing their discontent over the decision.

Fans took to social media to voice their opinions, with comments such as, “Well done for signing someone who has constantly mocked Indian soldiers,” from user Prantik. Another user, Kunal, stated, “I hope Kavya Maran faces the same amount of criticism as Shah Rukh Khan for buying Mustafizur, though Fiz never disrespected Indians, but Abrar is a habitual offender & even mocked the Indian Air Force.” Such sentiments reflect the deep-seated emotions surrounding the acquisition.

Kavya Maran’s Profile

Kavya Maran, born on November 3, 1991, is currently 34 years old and serves as the Executive Director of SUN TV Network Limited. She graduated with a B.Com degree from Stella Maris College in Chennai and later pursued an MBA from NYU Stern School of Business in New York. Her net worth is reportedly over ₹400 crore, showcasing her significant influence in the sports and entertainment industries.

Implications for the Franchise

The backlash against Maran and the SunRisers franchises raises questions about the potential impact on their brand image. One fan remarked, “SRH brand gonna dent heavily with this L move,” indicating that the decision may have long-term consequences for the team’s reputation among its supporters. The controversy surrounding the signing of Abrar Ahmed is not just a sports issue; it intertwines with national sentiments and the ongoing complexities of India-Pakistan relations.

Future of The Hundred Tournament

The Hundred tournament, scheduled to take place in the UK from July 21 to August 16, 2026, will be closely watched, especially in light of this acquisition. As teams prepare for the competition, the focus will undoubtedly be on how the SunRisers Leeds navigate the fallout from this decision and whether they can maintain their fan base amidst the controversy.

Current State of Affairs

As of now, Kavya Maran and her franchises are at a crossroads. The decision to sign Abrar Ahmed has not only drawn criticism but also highlighted the challenges sports franchises face when navigating complex geopolitical landscapes. The situation remains fluid, and the reactions from fans and stakeholders will likely shape the narrative in the coming weeks.

The post Kavya maran appeared first on 1News.