Previously, Justice Sattar and two other judges from the Islamabad High Court had expressed concerns about interference by intelligence agencies in judicial affairs. Their outspoken views may have contributed to their transfers.

The transfers occurred under Article 200 of the Constitution of Pakistan. This article was recently amended to eliminate the requirement for a judge’s consent before such transfers. This change has drawn criticism from various legal circles.

Key facts about the transfers:

• Justice Babar Sattar was transferred alongside Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani and Justice Saman Rafat Imtiaz.
• The Judicial Commission’s decision on Sattar’s transfer passed with a vote of 10 to 5.
• The three judges had previously opposed the elevation of Justice Dogar as chief justice of the IHC.
• The transfers were criticized for lacking transparency and uniform criteria by lawyers’ bodies.

Lawyers’ organizations have voiced strong objections. The Islamabad Bar Council stated that “isolated and non-uniform transfers, undertaken without any disclosed objective criteria, damage public confidence and judicial integrity.” This reflects growing unease regarding the influence of executive powers over judiciary matters.

Abdul Moiz Jaferii Advocate noted, “Without an independent judiciary, one cannot have a functioning democracy or a functioning economy.” This sentiment echoes broader concerns about maintaining judicial independence in Pakistan.

The next ruling date is not yet confirmed, but legal experts are closely monitoring these developments. The implications for judicial practices could be significant as this situation unfolds.

The post Justice babar sattar transfer appeared first on 1News.