The committee is headed by Minister for Law and Justice Azam Nazeer Tarar. It includes Minister of State for Interior Talal Chaudhry, the Cabinet Secretary, and the Commerce Secretary. The group must submit a comprehensive report to the Prime Minister within one week.

The Islamabad administration and the Capital Development Authority (CDA) will not take any further action until a final decision is made by the Prime Minister. This pause follows the Islamabad High Court’s ruling that upheld the CDA’s decision to cancel the building’s lease due to payment defaults by BNP Group.

Residents received eviction notices instructing them to vacate their apartments by midnight following this ruling. The project originally stems from a 13.5-acre plot awarded to BNP Group in an auction on March 9, 2005, for Rs4.88 billion.

The CDA canceled the lease in July 2016, citing multiple violations. In early 2019, the Supreme Court set aside the IHC judgment, directing the developer to pay Rs17.5 billion in installments over eight years. However, only Rs2.9 billion of this total has reportedly been paid.

The complex includes 253 apartments owned by several prominent figures, including Imran Khan and other politicians. Talal Chaudhry noted that out of these apartments, 184 were vacant while only 69 were partially or fully occupied.

Observers expect that during this period, all affected individuals will have opportunities to present their concerns before the committee, which will hear all parties without discrimination. The next steps in this case depend heavily on the committee’s findings and recommendations.

The post One constitution avenue appeared first on 1News.

The transfers were made under Article 200 of the Constitution of Pakistan. The Judicial Commission of Pakistan (JCP) recommended these changes as part of a series of decisions regarding high court judges. Justice Kayani has been noted for his rulings in human rights cases, including a significant ruling that mandated husbands to return the entire dowry to wives in divorce cases.

Justice Kayani was elevated to the Islamabad High Court in December 2015. His transfer comes at a time when he has been a vocal critic of the 27th Amendment, which has implications for judicial independence. The Islamabad Bar Council expressed concerns that these transfers could be perceived as punitive measures against judges who challenge administrative decisions.

Reactions from legal experts:

• Chief Justice Yahya Afridi stated that the proposed transfers appeared ‘penal’ in nature.
• Hafeezullah Yaqoob remarked that the transferred judges ‘became victims of their own behaviour’.
• Barrister Qasim Nawaz Abbasi emphasized that transfers should not be used as a tool for victimisation.
• Minister of State for Law Barrister Aqeel Malik defended the JCP’s decisions, asserting they are in accordance with the Constitution and law.

The situation raises critical questions about judicial accountability and how administrative authority interacts with judicial functions. Concerns linger about whether these actions will undermine judicial independence or serve as necessary measures for accountability.

The post Justice mohsin akhtar kayani appeared first on 1News.

Previously, Justice Sattar and two other judges from the Islamabad High Court had expressed concerns about interference by intelligence agencies in judicial affairs. Their outspoken views may have contributed to their transfers.

The transfers occurred under Article 200 of the Constitution of Pakistan. This article was recently amended to eliminate the requirement for a judge’s consent before such transfers. This change has drawn criticism from various legal circles.

Key facts about the transfers:

• Justice Babar Sattar was transferred alongside Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani and Justice Saman Rafat Imtiaz.
• The Judicial Commission’s decision on Sattar’s transfer passed with a vote of 10 to 5.
• The three judges had previously opposed the elevation of Justice Dogar as chief justice of the IHC.
• The transfers were criticized for lacking transparency and uniform criteria by lawyers’ bodies.

Lawyers’ organizations have voiced strong objections. The Islamabad Bar Council stated that “isolated and non-uniform transfers, undertaken without any disclosed objective criteria, damage public confidence and judicial integrity.” This reflects growing unease regarding the influence of executive powers over judiciary matters.

Abdul Moiz Jaferii Advocate noted, “Without an independent judiciary, one cannot have a functioning democracy or a functioning economy.” This sentiment echoes broader concerns about maintaining judicial independence in Pakistan.

The next ruling date is not yet confirmed, but legal experts are closely monitoring these developments. The implications for judicial practices could be significant as this situation unfolds.

The post Justice babar sattar transfer appeared first on 1News.

The court ruled that petitions similar to the one filed are automatically terminated with the enforcement of the Tax Amendment Act 2026. This act marks a decisive moment in Pakistan’s fiscal policy, as it sets new boundaries for taxation. The implications of this judgment extend beyond mere tax recovery; they touch upon constitutional limits regarding taxation within the country.

Meanwhile, across Europe, Germany is also making notable changes to its tax structure. The Federal Cabinet approved a draft law that will reduce air traffic tax by 16%, effective July 1, 2026. This reduction applies to three categories based on distance: under 2,500 kilometers, between 2,500 and 6,000 kilometers, and over 6,000 kilometers. The aim is to stimulate growth in the aviation sector and retain traffic that might otherwise be diverted to other European nations.

Experts have voiced concerns about these developments. Michael Hoppe, executive director of BARIG, stated that high costs have hindered growth and caused traffic to shift away from Germany for years. His comments reflect a broader concern within the aviation industry about competitive disadvantages created by taxation policies.

In Pakistan, the Islamabad High Court’s ruling has sparked discussions about the broader implications for taxation laws. Critics argue that the Federal Constitutional Court’s short order allows multiple taxes on the same taxable event—an issue that complicates compliance and fairness in taxation.

Legal experts emphasize that income cannot simply be defined by Parliament for revenue purposes without considering existing laws governing tax collection. They argue that clarity is essential for taxpayers navigating these complex regulations. “A tax may be independent in its charge,” one expert noted, “but it cannot be independent of the law that governs its collection.” This perspective underscores the need for transparency and consistency in tax legislation.

As both countries navigate these changes in their tax systems, stakeholders must remain vigilant. The stakes go far beyond immediate financial implications; they encompass fundamental questions about governance and economic health. In Pakistan, the FBR now has a clearer path to recover owed taxes, potentially replenishing state resources significantly impacted by previous legal hurdles.

Yet uncertainties linger regarding how these changes will play out in practice. Details remain unconfirmed as both nations implement their new policies and observe their effects on economic activity and taxpayer behavior.

The post Tax Developments in Pakistan and Germany appeared first on 1News.

Imran Khan, the founder of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), has been facing severe health issues, including a diagnosis of central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). Reports indicate that his vision in the right eye has deteriorated significantly, dropping to just 15 percent, which translates to an 85 percent loss of vision. The PTI has raised alarms about the restricted medical access Khan has experienced during his time in solitary confinement.

Since being ousted from power through a no-confidence motion in April 2022, Khan’s political situation has been precarious. His continued incarceration, along with that of approximately 1,400 individuals charged under anti-terror laws, has raised serious humanitarian and legal concerns. The PTI has been vocal about the need for immediate medical attention, demanding that Khan be transferred to Shifa International Hospital for a thorough medical examination.

Legal experts have emphasized that timely and proper medical care is a fundamental right of every detainee. The Islamabad High Court’s decision to allow a meeting between Khan and his lawyer is seen as a step towards addressing some of these pressing health concerns, but many remain skeptical about the adequacy of medical care provided in the jail.

In addition to his health issues, Khan’s political party, PTI, is facing significant challenges. The legal ramifications of the anti-terror charges against its members have created an atmosphere of fear and uncertainty within the party. Supporters of Khan have rallied, demanding justice and better treatment for their leader, highlighting the broader implications of his incarceration on Pakistan’s political landscape.

As the situation unfolds, the PTI continues to advocate for Khan’s rights and well-being, emphasizing that the continued incarceration of political leaders raises serious humanitarian and legal concerns. The party’s leadership is expected to push for further legal action to secure Khan’s release and ensure he receives the necessary medical care.

With the Islamabad High Court’s recent ruling, the next steps for Imran Khan and his legal team remain crucial. The outcome of his health assessments and any potential changes in his incarceration status could significantly impact the political climate in Pakistan, as well as the future of the PTI.

The post Imran Khan’s Health Concerns Intensify Amidst Continued Incarceration appeared first on 1News.

“You may go and meet the PTI founder,” stated Chief Justice Sarfraz Dogar, as he authorized a meeting between former Prime Minister Imran Khan and his lawyer, Salman Safdar. This meeting is set to take place at Adiala Jail in Islamabad on April 8, 2026, at 2 PM.

Imran Khan has been incarcerated since August 2023, facing a multitude of legal challenges that include serious charges ranging from corruption to terrorism. The Islamabad High Court has directed jail authorities to facilitate this crucial meeting, which is expected to address Khan’s ongoing health issues and legal strategy.

Chief Justice Dogar further remarked, “Go to jail and meet your client; we can fix the appeal schedule thereafter.” This indicates a willingness from the court to expedite the appeals process following the meeting.

Salman Safdar, appointed as a ‘friend of the court’, has been monitoring Khan’s health, which has reportedly deteriorated significantly. Khan has lost approximately 85% of vision in his right eye due to a serious eye condition, raising concerns about his well-being during his time in custody.

The court’s decision to allow this meeting comes in the wake of Khan’s ongoing legal troubles, which began after he was ousted from power through a no-confidence motion in April 2022. His political party, the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), has been vocal about his treatment and the implications of his imprisonment.

As the meeting approaches, the court has indicated that it could schedule appeals for two days each week, allowing Khan and his legal team to prepare adequately. “We can schedule the appeals for two days every week, so you may meet your client first,” Chief Justice Dogar noted.

Details remain unconfirmed regarding the specific topics that will be discussed during the meeting, but it is expected to play a pivotal role in Khan’s legal strategy moving forward.

With multiple cases pending, including a notable case involving 190 million pounds, the outcome of this meeting could significantly impact Khan’s future and the political landscape in Pakistan.

As developments unfold, the legal community and Khan’s supporters will be closely monitoring the situation, awaiting further announcements from the Islamabad High Court and Khan’s legal representatives.

The post Imran Khan Meets Lawyer in Jail Amid Ongoing Legal Battles appeared first on 1News.

The hearing of the Al-Qadir Trust case at the Islamabad High Court was adjourned due to the unavailability of the bench, leaving many, including Aleema Khan, disappointed. The next hearing is anticipated to be scheduled for April 17, 2026.

Aleema Khan, who has been vocal about the case, expressed her frustration, stating, “We will not leave until a new date is given.” She further criticized the justice system, saying, “What kind of justice system is this? We are being deprived of justice.” Khan emphasized the importance of timely justice, remarking, “Timely justice is essential for maintaining public confidence in the legal process.”

In a related development, the Islamabad High Court issued notices in a contempt of court petition against the Chairman of the Capital Development Authority. This petition was filed over allegations of tree cutting in violation of court orders, highlighting ongoing tensions regarding legal compliance in the region.

On the same day, Aleema Khan and others staged a sit-in outside the Islamabad High Court, demanding a new hearing date for the Al-Qadir Trust case. Their protest underscores the growing public interest and concern surrounding the case.

Imran Khan, who was arrested in connection with the Al-Qadir Trust case on May 9, 2023, has been a central figure in this legal saga. The court has allowed Barrister Salman Safdar to meet with him at Adiala Jail in relation to the ongoing proceedings.

The Al-Qadir Trust case has garnered significant attention, particularly due to the involvement of high-profile individuals like Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi. Observers are keenly awaiting further developments as the situation unfolds.

Details remain unconfirmed regarding the exact scheduling of the next hearing and the outcomes of the contempt petition against the Capital Development Authority.

The post Islamabad High Court Adjourns Al-Qadir Trust Case Hearing appeared first on 1News.

“We remained there till 4:30pm and finally decided to return,” stated Seemabia Tahir, a member of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party, after her attempt to meet Imran Khan at Adiala jail was thwarted. Despite being on a submitted list, PTI leaders were denied access to Khan, who has been in solitary confinement for the last five months.

The Islamabad High Court had previously allowed Khan to meet family members, lawyers, and other associates twice a week, but these meetings have been limited. His last reported meeting took place on February 10 with his lawyer Salman Safdar. The ongoing restrictions have raised concerns among his supporters and family, who allege that his treatment is a violation of both national and international laws.

Imran Khan’s situation has drawn significant attention, particularly as he has reportedly lost 85 percent of vision in one eye during his confinement. His family and PTI officials have expressed alarm over the conditions he is enduring, describing them as punitive and unjust.

In addition to the concerns surrounding Khan’s health and confinement, the PTI has also criticized the recent increase in liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) prices. Sheikh Waqas Akram, a PTI leader, remarked, “Increasing LPG prices at a time when people are already suffering from rising electricity, gas, and food costs will make life more difficult.” This statement reflects the party’s broader stance on economic issues affecting the populace.

PTI has labeled the LPG price hike as anti-people and unjust, further fueling their campaign against the current government’s policies. The party’s leadership argues that such increases disproportionately impact the lower and middle classes, who are already grappling with economic hardships.

Seemabia Tahir emphasized the gravity of Khan’s situation, stating, “Imran has been in solitary confinement for the last five months and it is a violation of national and international laws.” This assertion highlights the ongoing debate about the treatment of political figures in Pakistan and the implications for human rights.

As the political landscape in Pakistan continues to evolve, observers are closely monitoring the developments surrounding Imran Khan and the PTI. The party’s criticisms of government policies, particularly concerning economic issues, are likely to resonate with the public as they navigate rising costs and political uncertainty.

Details remain unconfirmed regarding the next steps for Imran Khan and the PTI, but the party’s leadership is expected to continue advocating for his rights and addressing the economic challenges facing the nation.

The post Imran Khan’s Solitary Confinement and Recent Developments appeared first on 1News.